Search Blog Posts

Showing posts with label Fair Tax/VAT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fair Tax/VAT. Show all posts

Monday, February 9, 2015

NM Sheriff Stands Against IRS & Federal Marshals - Cancels Land Sale

It’s good news and its happening now  – County sheriffs throughout the land are beginning to stir by standing up against the IRS and the corporations for the Constitutional rights of their citizens - - let’s appreciate them as they do their duty and apply the Rule of Law.

Let’s get behind our deputy sheriffs all over. While you’re at it ask your state government politicians why they haven’t reclaimed your sovereign state lands from the federal government. It’s yours, why let the fedgov & corporations live off it?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tim Brown , 02.09.2015

Constitutional Sheriffs are becoming more vocal and demonstrating why they are a valuable asset to freedom and their communities. The latest sheriff to take a constitutional stand is Eddy County, New Mexico's Scott London, the first sheriff in twenty-five to stand up to the IRS against a tyrannical attempt to sell a citizen in his county's land without due process.

Priscilla Jones provides the background information for the sheriff's actions:

Approximately ten days before Christmas, U.S. Marshals broke in the door of Carter's rental property with their guns drawn. The tenant was a young mother with a new baby—home alone while her husband was at work. Sheriff London was called to the property to intervene. He advised the Marshals that Carter's case was in appeal and he deserved due process. They threatened to arrest London, but he stood his ground and they backed off....

The Taxation & Revenue Department ordered Carter to cease "engaging in business in New Mexico" until his arbitrary tax debt was paid. Carter appealed this injunction on the grounds that it was both unconstitutional and vague, as it deprived him of his right to make a living and also prohibited him from, "carrying on or causing to be carried on any activity with the purpose of direct or indirect benefit."

Kent Carter's property was in the sights of the corrupt Internal Revenue Service and the Department of the Treasury has slated a sale of the properties in question for the 19th of February. When Sheriff London found out about it, he issued the following certified letter on February 4. 

Sheriff London cites Section 18 of the New Mexico Constitution and the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution as the basis for his stand against the federal tyrants.

"Thus I am notifying you that under compulsion to my oath to the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of New Mexico, I shall not allow the sales of these three properties on 19 February 2015," he wrote.

Sheriff Mack, founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association praised London's actions.

"Many officers have stood up over the years for the rights of citizens being victimized by the federal government," Mack said. "But Sheriff London is the first one to stand up to the IRS since the early 1990s." Mack said, "His actions show courage and humility. London is setting a good example for the rest of our sheriffs."

KrisAnne Hall documents why sheriffs like London are so important to the people in her excellent article on what is taking place in New Mexico.

"Short of physical resistance, due process and community oversight (a jury of your peers) was intended to be some of the greatest protections against government threat against property," Hall wrote.  "So important was to be the protection of due process, that it is placed multiple times in our Bill of Rights."

"For example, the 5th Amendment in the Bill of Rights declares that '…nor shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law;'  The 7th Amendment also declares, 'In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right to trial by jury, shall be preserved…'" she adds. 

"Both of those Amendments express the due process protections guaranteed to the people.  Sheriff London accurately states in his letter to the IRS that Mr. Carter has NOT exhausted his right to due process.  Yet, the IRS under the auspices of Judge Brack and the US District court, are attempting to deprive Mr. Carter of his property with full knowledge that Mr. Carter's right to due process is still engaged."

Currently, 100% of the Carter's Social Security benefits have been seized every month by the IRS. Under the law, Carter claims that the IRS can take no more than 15% of his Social Security benefits, but they've not only taken 100% of them, they've even deprived him of $2800.00 via his bank account.

Carter said the IRS is "worse than the mafia" and called them a "lie."

"Why should they be able to take anything?" he asked.

One court document, according to Jones indicates that Carter owed $145,000, which Carter maintains has no basis and was "pulled out of thin air" by an assessing agent. However, now the IRS claims that he owes upwards of $890,000! Carter says that number "doubled with the stroke of a pen."

"The IRS fabricates evidence against citizens by pulling numbers out of a hat and adding fees," said Sheriff Mack. "They wear people down emotionally and financially until they can't take it anymore. No citizen should ever have to fight the IRS for decades in order to keep his land."

Ms. Hall also provided updated information on Carter's motion. She wrote on February 7:

I have spoken to Kent Carter.  He filed a Motion to Stay the judges decision and was DENIED with NO explanation.  If I were to make a professional guess as to why the court denied it, it would be because he filed the Motion outside the "allowed" time frame.  That is no excuse for the court to not make that explanation, but there you have it.  I also spoke to Sheriff London. 

He received a call yesterday from the acting Under Secretary of the Department of Treasury, Matthew Rutherford.  Mr. Rutherford claims this case has been decided by the appellate court already in favor of the IRS.  If he is correct that is a record pace decision.  
Sheriff London told Mr. Rutherford that he had better present proof of that before he will ever consider allowing the sales to take place.  Apparently Mr. Rutherford was not at all happy about that.  This could get very interesting!

Perhaps it is not only Sheriff London that needs to take a physical stand at the properties of Mr. Carter, but also the people of New Mexico, just as Americans did for Cliven Bundy and his ranch.

As our forefather Benjamin Franklin once wisely said, "We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."

Monday, January 26, 2015

The IRS is a Private Collection Agency for the US Federal Reserve

This taxpayer should've had a V8
The Internal Revenue Service is considered to be a Bureau of the Department of the Tresaury; however, like the Federal Reserve, it is not part of the Federal Government (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I.; Public Law 94-564; Senate Report 94-1148, pg. 5967; Reorganization Plan No. 26; Public Law 102-391), and in fact was incorporated in Delaware in 1933. 
It is pointed out that all official Federal Government mail is sent postage-free because of the franking privilege, however, the IRS has to pay their own postage, which indicates that they are not a government entity. [The US Govt is but the enforcement arm for the IRS…Ed]

They are in fact a collection agency for the Federal Reserve, because they do not collect any taxes for the U.S. Treasury. All funds collected are turned over to the Federal Reserve. If you have ever sent a check to the IRS, you will find that it was endorsed over to the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve, in turn, deposits the money with the International Monetary Fund, an agency of the United Nations (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th edition, pg. 816), where it is filtered down to the International Development Association (see Treasury Delegation Order No. 91), which is part of the "International Bank for Reconstruction and Development", commonly known as the World Bank. Therefore, it is now clear that the American people are unknowingly contributing to the coming World Government.

The Secretary of the Treasury is the "Governor" of the International Monetary Fund (Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942; U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-81; 26 U.S.C.A. 7701(a)(11); Treasury Delegation Order No. 150-10). The United States has not had a Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch. 214, pg. 654) and for all intents and purposes the U.S. Treasury is the IMF (Presidential Documents, Volume 29, No. 4, pg. 113; 22 U.S.C. 285-288).

Chief Justice John Marshall said: "The power to tax involves the power to destroy." Alan Keyes, the former ambassador to the U.N., who ran for President in 2000 said: 

"We ought to have realized that the income tax is utterly incompatible with liberty. It is actually a form of slavery. A slave is someone the fruit of whose labor is controlled by somebody else. A slave is not somebody with nothing. Rather, he has only what the master lets him have ...

Under the income tax, the government takes whatever percentage of the earner's income it wants. The income tax, therefore, represents our national surrender to the government of control over all the money we earn. There are, in principle, no restrictions to the preemptive claim the government has." 

The income tax was intended to rob the earnings of the low and middle class; or as the saying goes, "the more you make, the more they take." However, the tax didn't touch the huge fortunes of Illuminati members. The tax was an indication that the U.S. was heading for a planned war, because they couldn't go into a war without money. Since the tax provided less than 5% of total Federal revenues, increases were later made to accommodate World War I, FDR's New Deal, and World War II. In July, 1943, workers in this country were subject to a payroll withholding tax in the form of a "victory tax" that was touted as a temporary tax to boost the economy because of the War, and would later be discontinued. However, the payroll deduction remained because it forced compliance.

Now come on, pssst... admit you didn't know this.

Friday, October 17, 2014

▶ The IRS Will Be Stifling Free Speech in Churches - YouTube

We have been passing these warnings along to you for years. Again, we ask you if your church could stand on its own salvational message without a taxpayer-subsidy? It's beyond us why this loss of freedom isn't clear to everyone. Relying on G-d to do it all, is not what He expected of you. You better get busy, the hour is late!

 Okay, so you're not a regular churchgoer or don't give a damn what 'causes' and 'charities' get your tax money, then don't whine, and by all means please DO NOT VOTE if you might have been doing so. Be considerate of others' welfare and lost liberties for once.



Published on Aug 4, 2014


JBS CEO Art Thompson's weekly news video update for August 04 - 10, 2014.

In this week's analysis behind the news video, JBS CEO Art Thompson discusses how the IRS agreed on July 17 to monitor church sermons for political content as part of an agreement made with the Freedom From Religion Foundation; how tax collection in the United States has always been rife with corruption; how our original Constitution prevented the the imposition of the federal income tax; how our original Constitution provided for U.S. Senators to be chosen by state legislatures, not by a popular vote of the people; and how we need to get back to a truly independent Senate that represents the state legislatures, repeal the income tax, and thereby get back to our original system of financing the government.

Sunday, September 21, 2014

Internet Sales Tax Coming

By Kelleigh Nelson
February 20, 2013
NewsWithViews.com

"All the world should be taxed" —Caesar Augustus

The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist leaves the skin. —Mark Twain

The power to tax is the power to destroy. —John Marshall - Chief Justice of the Supreme Court 

Big Government Republican - Who Owns Him -
On Thursday, February 14, 2013, Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican from Tennessee, joined fellow lawmakers in reintroducing a bill that would allow all states to require online retailers to collect sales tax just like their "Main Street" rivals.

Friday, July 4, 2014

When the Defaults Come, So Will the Wealth Grab



​S​ubmitted by Phoenix Capital Research on 07/04/2014 15:56 -0400


The biggest problem with the epic Central Bank rig of the last five years is that propping up a bankrupt financial system by printing money only works for so long.

The reason for this is that no one, whether it be a country, company, or person, can defy mathematics.

A loan can be extended, it can be restructured, or it can be finagled in countless financial ways. But at the end of the day, if your creditors lost faith in your ability to repay it… it's GAME OVER.

History has shown many times that countries try to inflate their debts away until the inevitable restructuring occurs. As Argentina is now showing us, when the "D" word becomes palpable, markets move quickly.

Anyone who is truly concerned about their wealth in the coming years needs to assess what has happened in Europe: higher taxes on top earnings and bail-ins (meaning your bank deposits are raided to fund bank bailouts).

Indeed, the IMF recently proposed a "global wealth tax" to "restore debt suatainability."

Here's the critical quote:

Recurrent taxes on net wealth (assets less liabilities) have been declining in Europe over the last 15 years (repealers include Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden). But this may be changing: Iceland and Spain reintroduced the tax during the crisis, and it is now actively discussed elsewhere. (There has been interest, too, in the possibility of a one-off wealth tax to restore debt sustainability, taken up in Box 6.)

The revenue potential is subject to considerable uncertainty (related, for instance, to the valuation of real estate) but is in principle sizable. Based on Luxembourg Wealth Study data, a 1 percent tax on the net wealth of the top 10 percent of households could, in principle, raise about 1 percent of GDP per year…

TAKEN FROM PAGE 49

The sharp deterioration of the public finances in many countries has revived interest in a "capital levy"—a one-off tax on private wealth—as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability.1 The appeal is that such a tax, if it is implemented before avoidance is possible and there is a belief that it will never be repeated, does not distort behavior (and may be seen by some as fair)

TAKEN FROM PAGE 59


Anyone who has assets worth over $200,000 should note that the Governments of the world WILL be coming for your money to prop up the insolvent banks. And they're going to be taking MORE instead of less.

Indeed, in the case of Cyprus, the proposed wealth tax of 7% of all deposits over €100,000 quickly rose to an incredible 47%!  Those individuals whose deposits were seized received equity in the banks themselves.

This scheme has been used in Spain multiple times… though the press has yet to note that when the banks FAIL, that equity is worth ZERO.

Cyprus has since released some of these funds though they are subject to capital controls (READ: YOU CANNOT GET YOUR MONEY OUT OF THE COUNTRY).

So…

1)   Cyprus staged a bail-in, froze accounts, and took 47% of wealth over the first €100,000.
2)   EU Finance ministers announced this policy will be a "template" for bailouts going forward.
3)   The IMF hints that a global wealth tax might be a good thing.

Connect the dots...

VIA ZH

Sunday, June 29, 2014

The Republican Sham of a VAT or "Fair" Tax would Finish Off America's Middle Class

We are led to believe that the two political parties are fighting ferociously to protect and PROVIDE for their constituencies. Ha! Not so. Either consumption tax as a "solution" would further cripple those with the least disposable income, the poor and the productive middle class. The burden of debt as it exists right now is heaped upon the backs of the working class. Additional economic burdens will bring him to his knees. In fact, these consumer taxes are racist at its roots.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

▶ Congressman Takes on AIPAC and Gets Thrown in Prison - YouTube

Not entirely on target with the issues. Supporting a VAT Tax (The Republican Sham of a VAT or "Fair" Tax would Finish Off America's Middle Class) is one of them.


Published on Apr 21, 2014
In this video Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange speaks with James Traficant who was thrown in prison for nearly 8 years after taking on the Israeli Lobby. The former congressman speaks on government corruption and the future of the United States. James Traficant believes he could be killed if he continues to speak out against the powers that be.

Sunday, February 9, 2014

US Citizen Expatriation's Rose to Record Last Year

With the US Treasury intimidating and threatening foreign governments to snitch on foreign depositors perhaps they're getting a feeling America doesn't want them anymore. And with the IRS the collection agency for the Fed there's no place to turn.


Friday, February 7, 2014

Thursday, February 6, 2014

E-Mail: IRS, Treasury drafted rules to restrict nonprofits


 U.S. Director of Exempt Organizations for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Lois Lerner waits to testify at a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on alleged targeting of political groups seeking tax-exempt status from by the IRS, on Capitol Hill in Washington, May 22, 2013. Lerner, the IRS official who this month revealed the tax agency's targeting of conservative groups asserted her constitutional right not to answer questions before a congressional committee on Wednesday. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst (UNITED STATES

Thursday, November 21, 2013

The Flat Tax Is Not Flat

Written by  Laurence M. Vance


Tuesday, 21 October 2008 09:31

The ideas of Karl Marx are alive and well — in the U.S. tax code. One of the planks of the Communist Manifesto, which states the conditions necessary for a transition from a capitalist to a communist society, is "a heavy progressive or graduated income tax." 

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Report: IRS Refunded $4B to Identity Thieves


from AP 7 Nov 2013, 12:42 PM PDT
By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER
Associated Press, Breitbart
WASHINGTON


The Internal Revenue Service issued $4 billion in fraudulent tax refunds last year to people using stolen identities, with some of the money going to addresses in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Ireland, according to an inspector general's report released Thursday.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Just When You Thought "Cyprus" Isn't Going to Happen Here. Guess What IMF Just Said WE Need to Do?


Submitted by Barracuda_Trader on Wed, 10/30/2013 - 02:28

This is a warning to anyone with a significant savings or retirement accounts
"The IMF is telling you what is coming. And I’m telling you the wealth confiscation is nothing to brush aside as impossible in America. We are a deeply, deeply troubled country. And deeply troubled countries always resort to unexpected solutions."

Friday, October 18, 2013

A Large Wealth Grab on Americans Could be On The Way

Submitted by Pater Tenebrarum of Acting-Man blog,
 Source Zero Hedge
IMF Discusses 'One-Off' Wealth Tax

It is undoubtedly nice to have a job with the World Bank or the IMF. One of the most enticing aspects for those employed at these organizations (which n.b. are entirely funded by tax payers), is no doubt that apart from receiving generous salaries and perks, they themselves don't have to pay any taxes.