26 October 2011
"HANDS OFF!" barks German newspaper Bild today, writes Adrian Ash at BullionVault. "Failed states are still going to get our gold," howls the tabloid's headline.
Now, "This may not be true," confesses the opening sentence of the article itself, barely two centimeters below. "But nevertheless!"
So what is getting Germany's version of the New York Post and Britain's The Sun – only with topless models on page 1, not 3 – so excited that it has to admit its own headlines are false in the very next line? "If Germany's exposure to the Euro-crisis rescue plan is expanded, it will be only a matter of time before the gold of the German Federal Bank melts in the debt fire!" reckons Bild columnist Einar Koch.
Not so fast, Eurocrats. Ruling coalition party politician (and "Euro rebel") Peter Gauweiler says that "Our gold reserves, only half of which by the way are still stored in Germany, are sacrosanct! Who knows how urgently we will need our gold treasure!"
Bild sures loves exclamation marks. But might it be onto something? Might the Euro bail-out mobsters gathered in Brussels to save the single currency really attack the world's second-largest national gold reserves – a full 3,401 tonnes – to raise cash where the European Central Bank won't print it?
In a word, no. Bild's rabble-rousing blocks them politically, while the terms of the Euro treaty blocks them legally. So never mind that even Germany's hoard, worth €135 billion at Wednesday's London PM Gold Fix, is barely equal to half of Greece's outstanding debt. Selling the family silver would signal the final, ultimate crisis – a true Götterdämmerung – yet again. National central banks cannot use their reserves to plug holes in their government's finances (as the Banca d'Italia and ECB had to remind Silvio Berlusconi in 2009), let alone another government's books.
Most urgently, pledging one nation's gold (and the richest member's gold, at that) to raise cash for another state would be unequivocal proof of absolute faith in the currency union's survival. Which no one seems willing to give just yet.
This isn't to say they shouldn't. Eurozone central banks hold 61% of their reserves in gold after all. So they are "overweight gold by any measure" as GFMS chairman Philip Klapwijk put it in 2010, just as the obvious buyers (or cash lenders), Asian central banks, are "underweight" by the same token with just 3% of their huge foreign currency reserves, on average, in gold. Nor is it to say they can't; British chancellors got the Bank of England to breach its Charter of 1844 three times in the following 20 years, as Berkeley professor Brad DeLong notes, printing more money than the law allowed in "extraordinary and unforseen emergencies".
Nor are we saying there's no precedent for it. Some 346 tonnes of gold was used as collateral by 10 commercial banks in Europe just last year, raising Dollar loans from the central banks' central bank, the Bank for International Settlements, in what the BIS called "regular commercial activities". Romania used gold as collateral to secure foreign-currency loans in 1974, as Dr.K.Lakshmi of the Saudi University relates, scrambling to deal with balance of payments problems after the first oil-price crisis. Italy did the same that year, with German chancellor Helmut Schmidt acting with Bundesbank president Karl Klasen to lend Rome $2 billion without alerting West Germany's independent central bank's decision-making council first.
India similarly raised cash using gold bullion to restock its foreign currency reserves after its balance of payments crisis of 1991 (also sparked by an oil-price shock after Gulf War I), pledging 20 tonnes via UBS in Switzerland and 40 tonnes via the Bank of England to secure IMF support – support it then reciprocated, long after repaying the loans, by buying 200 tonnes of IMF gold to help restructure the ailing Washington lender's own balance-sheet in 2009....
Read complete article from BullionVault
