Cancer and other Cures Frustrated by Rockefellers and the FDA *vid*

For more on how these tax-exempt foundations have corrupted our country with money gifted from us go here.
For another youtube expose of the FDA, go here 

For the extensive video gallery of the Rockefellers and their co-conspirators go to bottom of this post.

 

Published on Mar 12, 2014

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: As Americans fret about the Obamacare website and wonder how the country became enslaved to the high.

The modern day mainstream medical industry has a dubious history, deeply rooted by a drive for profit through the subversion and suppression of non-profitabl.

Alex Jones Radio show 5th of January 2009 broadcast. Dr. Russell Blaylock talks to Alex about the Rockefellers and their eugenics programs and how it all cam.

Part of a Eustace Mullins interview by wa5dxp, May 22, 2005.

Global Sciences Congress, December 1, 1990, Tampa, Florida.

An exploration of the mission and history and an overview of some current research underway at The Rockefeller University Hospital. The Hospital, which is ce.

How ROCKEFELLER ruined our Medical industry, hiding a simple cure for ALL diseases, even terminal cancer, for nearly free and no danger -- contrary to Corbot.

J'ai créé cette vidéo à l'aide de l'application de montage de vidéos YouTube ( A senior UN counter-terrorism official is to as.

The good folks at Natural News put together this short - but extremely revealing - video about the origins of both the American Medical Association and the n.

The Rockefeller Foundation was first set up in 1904 and called the General Education Fund. An organization called the Rockefeller Foundation, ostensibly to s.

J'ai créé cette vidéo à l'aide de l'application de montage de vidéos YouTube ( A senior UN counter-terrorism official is to as.

This is a video of the Rockefeller Estate. It is the home that John D. Rockefeller, the nations first billionaire, called Kykuit - dutch for lookout, because.

Rockefeller was used to tough situations from a young age. Watch his story in The Men Who Built America exclusively on HISTORY (Sky 529, Virgin Media 234, BT.

Rockefeller University cell biologist Ralph M. Steinman, who discovered the immune system's sentinel dendritic cells and demonstrated that science can fruitf.

David Rockefeller, youngest son of the late John D. Rockefeller Jr., discusses his new book, Memoirs, with UCSD history Professor Michael E. Parrish. Serie.

Quelle: The Rockefeller Medicine http.

Eustace Mullins in the Bobby Lee Show in 1992 on the Rockefeller Medical Monopoly and the matching cancer industry, the profits of cancer, death and vaccinat.

This is one of the Billionaires mentioned who decide who lives and who dies, pay attention to what he is saying and why.

Voices for National Service and ServiceNation, in partnership with AmeriCorps Alums, have launched the I Serve Because. Video Contest. This is why I serv.

7 minute vid starts out at President Garfield's monument and tomb. Then we parked and walked up to the Rockefeller family plot.

Chairman John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV gave an opening statement at the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation hearing on June 26, 201.

Les Rockefeller - 1l3.

 

This is the video gallery of subversive activities of the Rockefellers and their agents.

Members of U.S. Military have no Recourse if they Suffer from Poor Medical Treatment

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Military patient being moved between Walter Reed and National Naval medical centers (photo: Pablo Mercad, Walter Reed)

 

Serving one’s country not only means putting yourself in harm’s way before a foreign enemy, it also means putting your health in the hands of a military health system that has no real accountability for making fatal mistakes.

In the civilian world, a patient who is misdiagnosed and harmed by such a mistake can sue their doctor for malpractice. But this recourse does not exist with the military’s health providers, who can miss a serious medical problem with an individual and not worry about being taken to court, or even have their mistake shared with other patients.

About 1.3 million active-duty service members have to use the military’s healthcare system for care. For those who experience poor treatment, they are “virtually powerless to hold accountable the health care system that treats them,” according to Sharon LaFraniere at The New York Times.

“They are captives of the military medical system, unable, without specific approval, to get care elsewhere if they fear theirs is substandard or dangerous,” LaFraniere wrote. “Yet if they are harmed or die, they or their survivors have no legal right to challenge their care, and seek answers, by filing malpractice suits.”

Up until 18 months ago, most military personnel couldn’t even file complaints about poor medical treatment. But even though that avenue is now open, the complaints are mostly just filed away and don’t see the light of day, nor are they shared with the public because “investigations at military hospitals and clinics are confidential.”

Part of the reason for that, according to LaFraniere, is to prevent the 2 million or so civilian relatives of those service members from seeing the results, since they are not barred from filing malpractice suits. Even the military personnel themselves are not informed of the results of any inquiry that may have been undertaken in response to their complaints.

Cheryl Garner, a retired military intelligence officer told the Times: “There is just no transparency. You can’t sue. You have no insight into the process. As active duty, we just don’t have much recourse.”

Compounding the problem is the fact that the hospitals themselves don’t follow regulations. “Military hospitals often fail to conduct safety investigations that the Defense Department mandates when patients suffer serious harm or die,” wrote LaFraniere.

Potential whistleblowers are also dissuaded for calling attention to matters they see as being detrimental to patients. Medical workers who do speak out about problems with patient care often suffer reprisals.

In a project that has helped to reduce patient injuries, some military medical officials are adopting a program called I-PASS, which is a system of training and communication tools to improve transfer of patients between medical providers. About 80% of serious medical mistakes that are detrimental to patient health and wellbeing occur as a result of miscommunication between caregivers during the handoff of patients from one health care facility to another, according to The Joint Commission, a non-profit group of more than 20,500 U.S. health care organizations. Nine civilian hospitals have already partnered with military medical officials to implement the program. To date there has been a reported 30% reduction in patient injuries caused by medical errors as a result of the employment of I-PASS, according to a study performed by Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, both of which helped develop the program.

-Danny Biederman, Noel Brinkerhoff

To Learn More:

Service Members Are Left in Dark on Health Errors (by Sharon LaFraniere, New York Times)

Military Partnering with Civilian Hospitals to Reduce Medical Errors (Health.mil)

Search Tells You If, When, and How Much YOUR Doctor Was Paid by Big Pharma

on 4 March, 2015 at 9:03 pm

Is your doctor on the payroll of the mega pharmaceutical companies? If you want to find out if your doctor’s aggressive push for Viagra could be stemming from financial interests, there’s a government website that can do just that.

The Open Payments Data website presented by the government reveals to you the depths to which your personal care provider could be controlled by Big Pharma’s institutions. From physicians to teaching hospitals, you can even identify the company making payments.

Is your doctor on the payroll? This is a really awesome tool to tell whether or not your current or perspective healthcare providers are hiding their vested interests.

Watch also: John Oliver Exposes The Outrageous Practices Of Big Pharmaceutical Companies

Source theglobalelite

Big Pharma's Mass Vaccination Agenda: Propaganda Assault on Informed Consent

March 2, 2015

By James F. Tracy

Major US news media have presented a grossly distorted and misleading interpretation of vaccines and their relationship to public health since early January. These  journalistic organs have suggested the recent measles outbreak in the Western US has been a crisis of monumental proportions.

This flagrant and cynical sensationalism has become a foundation for intense advocacy on behalf of the pharmaceutical corporate and regulatory cartel targeting patient informed consent—a founding principal of modern medical practice and personal freedom. Keeping in mind the close to 300 vaccine products now in the pharmaceutical industry’s pipeline,[1] closer analysis of “measles outbreak” press coverage suggests a conscious effort by corporate news media to virtually banish such notions and practices from the public mind. A news media dependent on over $1 billion in advertising dollars from big pharma must almost by necessity indulge their clients’ broader agenda.

An impartial journalistic approach to the question of vaccination and personal choice would provide equal and unprejudiced airing of “both sides,” in addition to the varied grey areas in the debate, from the corporate and statist entities flying the banner of mandatory vaccination to cautious segments of the citizenry voicing reservations toward such technology alongside the foremost prerogative of personal choice.

A LexisNexis search of US newspaper and wire service articles from December 28, 2015—the official start date of the California measles outbreak—to February 8, 2015 [2] using the search terms “measles” and “vaccination” yields 799 press releases or wire stories and 746 newspaper articles and opinion pieces. Much of this coverage predictably emphasizes the array of vaccine-friendly assumptions and pronouncements from entities abetting the pharmaceutical industry’s long-term profit-specific objectives.

For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is, alongside the Food and Drug Administration, the most powerful bureaucratic arm utilized by the global pharmaceutical cartel to elicit compliance with the federal vaccine schedule for children from the medical profession and broader population. Of the article sample referenced above, close to one-third (517) reference the “Centers for Disease Control” or “CDC” in their text, suggesting citation of the agency and its policies to persuasively instruct readers on vaccine efficacy and safety.

In contrast, the same body of over 1,500 press releases, news stories and editorials reference “informed consent” only three times—and when the term is used it is done so either in passing or to disparage the practice itself. For example, Arthur Caplan, a professor of medicine at New York University, warns against doctors even considering the practice of informed consent in regard to vaccines. “The science is unimpeachable,” Caplan proclaims. ” Vaccines do not cause autism; measles is dangerous and contagious; inoculating against the disease is neither pointless nor riskier than abstention.” The physician then amazingly suggests that genuine informed consent–explaining how a vaccine such as Measles, Mumps, Rubella, which can severely injure, incapacitate, or kill the child patient–must be categorically replaced by the dissemination of pharmaceutical industry propaganda and half-truths. “Those doctors who counsel otherwise – who distort what patients need to know to preserve their health or that of their children – have crossed a bright red line. They have violated a patient’s right to informed consent, which depends on accurate information.”[3]

READ MORE

FDA is Hiding 22 Fraudulent Falsified Studies from the American Public

Were you of the understanding that Congress had Oversight over the FDA?

Posted by: Stephanie Vick, staff writer in Science News February 24, 2015 

(NaturalHealth365) Professor Charles Seife of the Arthur L. Carter Institute of Journalism at New York University recently uncovered some disturbing evidence about the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This information came to light when he made a Freedom of Information request earlier this year. 

When Seife received his information, he learned that 22 clinical trials submitted to the FDA were falsified, and the results of these falsified trials were not revealed to the public.

With his students assisting him, Professor Seife compared the FDA’s actions regarding these trials against information on them in peer-reviewed studies. The results of Seife’s investigation were recently published in the online journal, JAMA Internal Medicine.

The FDA is keeping the public in the dark about scientific fraud

When clinical trials are found to have violated proper practices or to have been falsified, the FDA takes regulatory action against those conducting the trials. 

When this is required, paperwork regarding the trials is traditionally marked as “official action indicated (OAI).”

Seife’s investigation revealed that 57 trials received the OAI indicator for everything from bad record keeping (35 studies) to actual falsification of results (22 studies). The affected trials took place between 1998 and 2013. The FDA never informed the public of these findings or of any actions taken against the facilitators of the studies.

How could the FDA allow falsified studies to be published?

While the FDA did take ‘official action’ against clinical trial facilitators who falsified results, they allowed the results to be published. No retractions for these falsified results were ever required. Studies with blatantly falsified results remain in medical journals, misleading other researchers as well as the public about the truth.

It is no longer a ‘secret’, the FDA has violated the public trust.  This is the same organization that refuses to label seafood that has mercury – a known neurotoxic (heavy metal) substance; allows the deadly (artificial) sweetener aspartame to be sold in food products and gives its approval to drugs that cause harm.

By allowing falsified results of clinical trials to remain in publications with no retractions required, the FDA is violating the public’s trust. The public has a right to expect transparency from the FDA, as the health and safety of America’s people depend on it.

Professor Seife has stated that the FDA seldom takes any action to make sure falsified study results are corrected in the medical literature, even when it finds significant departures from good study practices. And, the only reason why the FDA has not been taken down is because the federal government, its regulatory agencies and the U.S. legal system work together to protect corporate interests – while minimizing its exposure to lawsuits.

The evidence is clear: The FDA does not care about public safety

When the FDA does NOT retract inaccurate and/or falsified research projects – this indicates a clear violation of their duties and obligations – both morally and professionally. In fact, the actions of the FDA are criminal – by NOT making every (reasonable) step to protect the population.

And, just in case you have any doubt how bad this organization really is – consider this quote from a credible source:

“The thing that bugs me is that the people think the FDA is protecting them. It isn’t. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it’s doing are as different as night and day.” – Herbert Ley Jr., M.D., former Commissioner of the FDA.

The FDA consistently acts as the ‘protector’ of drug company profits and supports the monopoly-control that the pharmaceutical industry has over the world.  Not only does the FDA hide fraud, they actually censor quality health information from getting into the public domain. 

In fact, here are several examples of how the FDA deliberately withholds lifesaving information from the general public:

• Between 1992 and 1996, the FDA prohibited companies that sell folic acid from telling women of childbearing age that .4 mg of folic acid daily before pregnancy could reduce the incidence of neural tube defects (including spina bifida and encephaly) by 40%. FDA’s censorship contributed to a preventable 10,000 neural tube defect births.
• Between 1994 to 2000, the FDA prohibited companies that sell omega-3 fatty acids from telling Americans that those fatty acids found in fish oil could reduce the risk of coronary heart disease by as much as 50%. FDA’s censorship contributed to a preventable 1.8 million sudden death heart attacks.
• Between 2000 and the present, FDA prohibits companies that sell saw palmetto extract (the fruit of the dwarf American palm tree) from telling Americans that saw palmetto reduces enlarged prostates and relieves related symptoms. Approximately 50% of all men age 50 and older suffer from enlarged prostates and are denied access to this information.
• Between 2000 and the present, FDA prohibits companies that sell glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate from telling Americans that those dietary ingredients treat osteoarthritis and relieve osteoarthritic pain and stiffness. Approximately 20 million Americans suffer needlessly from osteoarthritis.

This criminal behavior must be stopped. Without the correct information, other researchers, as well as the general population, are being misled and allowed to go down roads regarding their own studies, health and wellness practices – that lead to nowhere, or eventual harmful outcomes.  The FDA has broken public trust; acted without regard to public safety and must be held accountable for their actions.

References:

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/289167.php

http://www.smnweekly.com/fda-possibly-hidden-22-fraudulent-clinical-trials/15039

http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2109855

http://www.stopfdacensorship.org

Source via naturalhealth365

VA 'I CARE' slogan slammed by veterans, employees as mockery of reform

Reform, restructuring, management modelling, or even "caring" are disingenuous expectations for the VA to achieve. The VA can't achieve these objectives as they like all government agencies flounder inefficiently and expensively outside the traditional American marketplace of competitiveness. 

The VA has a captive clientele. VA doctors and medical staff have had to set aside their Hippocratic oath of placing patient care above all else. That promise of real patient care has been superseded by government edict. 

For the VA's McDonald to promise America otherwise is dishonest, he knows it, and that is...immoral. 

Veterans Affairs Secretary Robert McDonald says the “I CARE” principles “focus our minds on our mission of caring and thereby guide our actions toward service to others.” “I CARE” stands for integrity, commitment, advocacy, respect and excellence. (Associated Press) more >

By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Sunday, February 15, 2015 

The embattled Veterans Affairs Department, now ranked by a government watchdog as among the most troubled federal agencies, is reminding employees in a memo why they should care about their work.

The document circulating among employees is titled the “I CARE Quick Reference” sheet, and it spells out the desired core values of the VA: integrity, commitment, advocacy, respect and excellence. The memo says the VA is “a model of unrivaled excellence due to employees who are empowered, trusted by their leaders, and respected for their competence and dedication.”

But after a year in which VA officials were accused of keeping secret waiting lists and concealing delayed care for veterans, some agency employees and veterans are questioning the “I CARE” program as a cosmetic effort that will do little to improve services.

“Management has made a mockery of it,” said one VA employee, who asked not to be named for fear of retaliation.

The head of a veterans group said veterans and active-duty service members are still waiting for “real, meaningful change” in the VA’s quality and promptness of health care services.

“Adopting a catchy acronym and circulating a checklist is not enough,” said Pete Hegseth, CEO of Concerned Veterans for America. “It’s easy to put on an ‘I CARE’ pin, but it doesn’t matter unless you actually demonstrate that care through your actions and the results you deliver. That’s what veterans, military members and their families are looking for: real results, not a slogan.”

But a spokesman for the Veterans of Foreign Wars said the memo could be useful and called it “a good example of getting people to sing the same tune by providing the same sheet of music.”

“The reference sheets leave little doubt about the direction VA leadership is headed, which for employees means either get with the program or get out,” said VFW spokesman Joe Davis. “The VFW wants the VA to identify and fix what’s broken, to hold employees appropriately accountable, and to help restore the faith of veterans in their VA.”

VA Secretary Robert McDonald, tapped by President Obama last year to revamp the embattled agency, said in a statement on the agency’s website that the “I CARE” principles “focus our minds on our mission of caring and thereby guide our actions toward service to others.”

“These values define our culture and strengthen our dedication to those we serve,” Mr. McDonald said.

But the VA culture was responsible for the agency’s addition last week to the Government Accountability Office’s “high-risk list” of troubled federal programs. The GAO said it has “serious concerns” about VA management and oversight of its health care system and found “inadequate training for VA staff.”

The watchdog agency’s report noted that Congress approved $15 billion last year to address rising demand for veterans’ health care, including increased use of non-VA health care providers.

“Coordination of care between VA and non-VA providers is critical,” the GAO report said. “Without it, there is increased risk of unfavorable health outcomes for veterans. The quality of care may be adversely affected if important clinical information is not promptly communicated between VA and non-VA providers.”

Mr. McDonald said he wanted the agency on the high-risk list to shine a light on problems and what officials are doing to fix them. In an effort to increase accountability, Mr. McDonald said Sunday, the department fired 900 employees under his leadership.

“We’re not where we need to be yet, I’m not saying that. What I’m saying is we’re making progress,” he said on “Meet the Press.”

Mr. McDonald encountered opposition last week from House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Jeff Miller, Florida Republican, to an administration proposal to cut some funding from the $10 billion VA Choice Card program. Mr. McDonald said he wants greater flexibility to expand services.

About 24,000 veterans have made appointments for private care since the Choice Card program was enacted last summer. Mr. Miller said any extra money in the program should be used to make sure other veterans can enroll.

The VA’s nationwide system of 150 medical centers and more than 800 community-based outpatient clinics has faced growing demand in the past decade, largely because of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The GAO said enrollment in the VA health care system increased from 6.8 million veterans in fiscal year 2002 to 8.9 million veterans in fiscal year 2013, and outpatient medical appointments increased by about 85 percent over that period.

Congress more than doubled the VA’s annual health care budget over that period, from $23 billion in 2002 to $55.5 billion in fiscal 2013.

“Despite these substantial budget increases, for more than a decade there have been numerous reports — by GAO, VA’s Office of the Inspector General, and others — of VA facilities failing to provide timely health care,” the GAO report said.

Mr. Hegseth said veterans’ patience with Mr. McDonald is growing thin.

“The VA reform bill signed into law last August provided Secretary McDonald with the authority he needed to hold failing senior executives accountable and expand patient choice for veterans to allow them access to the care they need, but he has been consistently resistant to dismissing failing executives and now is even seeking to undermine funding for the choice provision — despite his promises to bring changes to the VA,” Mr. Hegseth said. “When Secretary McDonald was nominated by President Obama, we said we were cautiously optimistic about his nomination. In retrospect, it’s clear that the caution was warranted but the optimism was not.”

Mr. Davis, of the VFW, said more patience is required to let proposed reforms take hold.

“This crisis in access and confidence is still less than a year old,” Mr. Davis said. “The VA is a very large but decentralized organization, which means it can’t turn on a dime like the military can. Just as it took awhile for all the past problems to reach critical mass, it may take even longer for the VA to properly identify all that’s broken before the healing can begin.”

• Jacqueline Klimas contributed to this report.

Source washingtontimes

Veterans could visit doctors or hospitals closer to home under federal proposal

Now this will delight many of my out-of-town VA acquaintances who must travel overnight distances to reach the Charleston VA.  I've been a longtime advocate for farming out veteran care to community hospitals. 

Much greater convenience for the vet and their families, and reduced expenses for the VA. The biggest hurdle as we see it is the government puts itself first to protect their monopolistic control over this one segment of Americans. Greed, personal careers and non-accountability trump performing up to what's needed in a competitive market. Mouthing care for the veteran is the routine practice while actual concern is not the result. Morality does not have a role.

Congressman Frank Lobiondo after he first unveiled his proposed new legislation to allow veterans to receive Healthcare at local non-VA Hospitals, on the steps of Nabb Leslie American Legion in Millville, Tuesday, May 27, 2014. (Staff Photo by Cindy Hepner/South Jersey Times)

By Alex Young | South Jersey Times on February 16, 2015 at 12:00 PM

Congressman Frank LoBiondo (R-2) has reintroduced a bill that seeks to expand reforms enacted last year by allowing veterans to receive hospital care at non-Department of Veterans Affairs facilities, he announced in a statement recently.

LoBiondo said last year's reforms were a step in the right direction, but they didn't go far enough.

Under the 2014 VA reform law, veterans have to fall into certain categories to use a non-VA facility.

They either have to live more than 40 miles from a VA medical facility or outpatient clinic, or they have to show that they waited at least 30 days for an appointment at a VA facility.

When reached by phone Friday, LoBiondo said that because of the area's VA clinics, veterans in South Jersey don't qualify for the distance category even if they need to get a service that is only offered at one of the larger medical centers.

Joe Hannagan, veterans' service officer for Salem County, said many veterans in South Jersey -- especially those from Atlantic and Cape May counties -- face a tough road of reaching a VA hospital in Wilmington, Delaware, or Philadelphia.

"They have to be put on a bus and travel three hours," he said. "They stay at the hospital half a day and then go back home."

LoBiondo said there is a bus that starts in Atlantic County and heads through Vineland before going on to Wilmington.

"It's a new bus, but it's not the best option if you're an older vet and you've got a long ride on your hands," he said. "All of the vets on the bus have to have their appointments in Wilmington before you head home."

LoBiondo's new bill would eliminate the distance and wait criteria and allow veterans to go to the doctor or hospital of their choosing.

"South Jersey veterans must continue to travel out of state for complex medical care despite quality health care providers available locally," he said in the release. "My legislation would give South Jersey veterans that choice and complete the reforms Congress began last year."

The act would require the VA to establish pilot programs in each of the 23 Veterans Intergrated Service Networks and would provide eligible veterans with a unique identification card that would allow them to receive medical care at non-VA facilities at the VA's expense.

The legislation specifically states that LoBiondo's 2nd Congressional district will be one of the pilot-program areas.

State Sen. Jeff Van Drew (D-1) said this legislation would be a huge benefit to the veterans in his district, as well as in other areas.

He said veterans in Ocean County have to travel all the way up to East Orange to get special treatments.

Van Drew also believes the act could give a nice boost to the local economy at local hospitals.

"The hospitals are so anxious," he said. "I meet with hospital representatives regularly, and they're really pleased about us heading in this area. There isn't a hospital yet that isn't anxious to be involved in some way.

"It's not going to be easy. ... We thank the congressman for his work and look forward to working with him in a bipartisan way. We'll continue to push no matter how long it takes."

LoBiondo believes this bill would be a big positive in fulfilling a promise to the nation's veterans.

"These are men and women who have put their lives on the line in service to the United States," he said. "They were promised that we would take care of them and their health care needs."

Alex Young may be reached at alexyoung@southjerseymedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @AlexYoungSJT. Find the South Jersey Times on Facebook.

 

via nj.com

Keeping Big Pharma in Seventh Heaven is Keeping Addicts in Hell

February 11, 2015 

by Martin G. Selbrede How the State of Massachusetts is Moving the Goalposts in Light of Dr. Kishore's Successful Treatment of Addiction to Provide Pharmaceutical Companies with a State-Funded Customer Base This is the seventh in an ongoing series of articles about Dr. Punyamurtula S. Kishore, the Christian doctor who innovated the Massachusetts Model of addiction treatment.  The previous six articles documented how conventional addiction therapies based on substitute narcotics (methadone and Suboxone®) leave only 2% to 5% of patients who won't relapse back into full-scale addiction after twelve months. The few who haven't relapsed will often take prescribed substitute narcotics indefinitely, creating life-long issues for them. In contrast, Dr. Kishore's sobriety-based approach is non-narcotic in orientation. His method doesn't lead to a miserable 2% to 5% success rate at the one-year mark, but an astonishing 50% to 60% success rate based on hard test data (rising from 37% in 1994 to over 50% in 2011 with a quarter-million patients having passed through his program). ...from Hippocrates Oath, solemnly kept by Dr. Kishore - Man cannot serve two masters. Massachusetts buried this medical miracle by incarcerating Dr. Kishore in September 2011 and withholding Medicare payments to his fifty-two treatment centers, causing their complete collapse. The consequences of the state's actions against Dr. Kishore's work permeate the previous six articles. To repeat that material, even in condensed form, would consume most of this present article. If you've not followed this series, review the earlier articles before diving into this newest article. Without the background of the earlier articles, you can fall prey to ongoing manipulation (by omission and commission) by the state and its media gatekeepers. Moving the Goalposts The first example of "moving the goalposts" in this series had reference to the cleverly-edited graphic used to hide the disastrous 80% recidivism rate occurring during the first month of conventional drug addiction treatments. Because the first-month results have simply been chopped off the graph, they don't come under consideration. This opens the door to redefining success. One moves the goalposts for one of two reasons: to block a competitor from succeeding, or to create the illusion of success for yourself. This tactic is a blatant example of the latter. Moving of the goalposts in such a way can only be effective if you are ignorant of the correct location of the goalposts. If someone comes along and blows the whistle on how dislocated the goalposts are, and what constituencies are benefiting from the reality distortion field thus imposed, he becomes a threat. If the whistleblower's success rate is many times higher than the conventional success rate, this becomes a second layer of threat. Both forms of threat to the status quo need to be quashed to maintain the blissful ignorance of the populace, to keep the goalposts at their "preferred" new location. When the media keeps the people it reputedly serves ignorant of both aspects of these moved goalposts, it becomes a key accessory to the redefinition of success. Once journalists start down that road, it becomes increasingly difficult for them to admit fault, recant, and fight against the ignorance they've been enforcing so faithfully. No one wants to admit culpability in moving the goalposts. Therefore, Dr. Kishore's clinical record is simply ignored. There are three other major respects in which crucial goalposts have been moved during the escalating drug addiction crisis taking its massive toll upon our communities. We will examine the tactics, significance, and high price we are all paying for the moving of these goalposts that should never have been moved. We will then come to understand why Solomon's maxim remains painfully valid for us today: "Remove not the old landmark; and enter not into the fields of the fatherless" (Prov. 23:10). Click to continue reading this article.

Archaeological study explores drug-taking and altered states in prehistory

11 February, 2015 - 00:27 Mark Miller

 

Neanderthals on speed 60,000 years ago; Paleolithic art inspired by psilocybin or Amanita muscaria mushroom trips; and alcohol-fueled religious worship all over the world down through the ages – these are just some of the drug-taking behaviors reported in a new research paper which looked at decades of archaeological evidence to see how prevalent the use of psychoactive substances and other reality-bending practices was in prehistory. The paper also explores the link between religion and hallucinogens, stimulants, alcoholic beverages and other substances.

Elisa Guerra-Doce, an archaeologist at the University of Valladolid in Spain, says that altered states of consciousness were very nearly ubiquitous in societies throughout prehistory and history. An anthropologist who studied 488 human societies published a paper in 1973 that said 437 or 90 percent of them reportedly incorporated altered states of consciousness (ASC) into their fundamental belief systems.

Cohoba, a hallucinogen made of ground tree seeds, was used by Taino shamans. Users put cohoba powder on a carved pedestal and inhaled through the nose via an inhaler like this piece, from between 1000 and 1500 A.D. This carved stone shows a shaman or behique in a trance. (Walters Art Museum photo/Wikimedia Commons)

Guerra-Doce looked at four types of archaeological evidence to do her study of altered states among prehistoric societies:

• Fossils of burned, waterlogged or desiccated leaves, seeds, fruits or wood of psychoactive plants
• Psychoactive alkaloids in skeletal remains and artifacts
• Residues of alcoholic beverages
• Depictions of drinking scenes or mood-altering plants inspired by inspired by altered states of consciousness

She found chemical residue from and parts of many psychoactive plant in levels of dwellings from various eras and in artifacts and human remains from thousands of years ago. People used alcoholic beverages nearly everywhere for thousands of years, mildly stimulating betel leaves in Asia as far back as 13,000 B.C., hallucinogens derived from the San Pedro cactus in the Andes as far back as 10,600 years, hallucinogenic mescal beans in Texas and northern Mexico 11,000 years ago, and peyote from between 9,000 and 5,600 years ago.

MORE

• Prehistoric people used hallucinogens as part of sacred burial rituals
• New study sheds light on drug culture in Tiwanaku, Bolivia
• The ancient origins of the ceremonial Kava drink of the Pacific

The Greek god of wine, Dionysus, crosses the sea in his dolphin boat with grape vines above the sail in a bowl from 530 B.C. by Exsekias. (Carole Raddato photo/Wikimedia Commons)

People also apparently got high on opium as the poppy was domesticated in the western Mediterranean 8,000 years ago; the mildly stimulating (among other benefits) coca leaves for tea and chewing in South America from at least 6,000 B.C.; cannabis (marijuana) in central Asia 7,000 years ago and hallucinogenic nightshade all over the world as long ago as 5,000 years. There were tobacco in the New World 4,000 years ago, hallucinogenic yopo snuff from the New World more than 4,000 years ago, and hallucinogenic mushrooms from various places and times around the world.

Peyote plant (Frank Vincentz photo/Wikimedia Commons)

Guerra-Doce states in her report:

Ethnographic studies have long been exploring the place of fermented beverages (beer, fruit wines, rice wine, mead, koumiss, pulque, chicha, among many others) and psychoactive plants, not only hallucinogenic but also narcotic and stimulant (peyote cactus, morning glories seeds, sacred mushrooms, ayahuasca or yaje brew, cohoba, Virola snuffs, coca, tobacco, mescal beans, San Pedro cactus, iboga, betel, kat, pituri, cannabis, nightshade plants, opium poppy, and ephedra, just to offer a few examples) within traditional societies in every corner of the planet, above all in the Americas.

Published in Time and Mind: The Journal of Archaeology, Consciousness and Culture, Guerra-Doce’s article is titled 'Psychoactive Substances in Prehistoric Times: Examining the Archaeological Evidence' (PDF link). While the article focuses on entheogens, or plants and alcoholic beverages that 'generate the divine within,' it also refers to other practices that people used to alter their reality, including auditory stimulation, exposure to extreme temperatures, food restrictions, breathing techniques, extreme physical exercise, or meditation.

Featured image: Ancient relief carving depicting drug use (Michael Bradley)

By Mark Miller

Source: We found the Comments interesting also: ancient-origins

CNN IS LOBBYING FOR FORCED VACCINATIONS!

They are essentially advocating for the government to takeaway your right to your own body and children!

CNN IS LOBBYING FOR FORCED VACCINATIONS! This is scary. They are essentially advocating for the government to takeaway your right to your own body and children!

To do that CNN is using the fear tactic to scare people into more business for pharmaceutical companies. JUST COUNT HOW MANY DRUG COMMERCIALS YOU WILL SEE ON CNN TODAY ALONE AND TRY TO RECALL HOW MANY YOU’VE SEEN IN THE PAST. Remember Humera… Zorelto… and countless other drug advertisements that always end with a fast reading voice that talks about side effects which include nearly everything from diarrhea to death… How can anyone trust CNN now, when they are openly funded by the very companies that have the most to benefit from vaccines sales?

Let me be clear, while I do not deny that most vaccines work (so do steroids, antibiotics, hormone and chemical drugs, all with severe side-effects) I prefer to have the final say weather or not to have such drugs or chemicals in my body – NOT the government, the pharmaceuticals, even my doctor and especially not the CNN.

If any news networks or the government feel so strongly about vaccinations (that they are considering forcing people to take these drugs) then here’s my proposition.

Lets have CNN dedicate 5 hours of their valuable air time (or as long as it’s necessary) to have a national uninterrupted debate where the best qualified opposing sides will argue their case to the public. Then air this debate two times per week for two months to make sure most people in the nation are informed about this matter.

After which have a national vote on this issue. That would be a much more professional way of presenting this highly important matter to the public, especially in light of how CNN is doing this now through short 10 min edited segments, without any reasonable opposition and with media prosecutions as well as character assassinations of anyone opposing vaccinations. If that is not propaganda, I do not know what is….

So why I don’t trust vaccines? Aside from my personal research, because CNN is pushing them on to me in a propagandistic way. They are unprofessionally using media techniques that are clearly visible to me and that puts in question not just the content they are presenting but their objectivity, honesty and any benevolent intent (that I highly doubt CNN has).

My last suggestion is – move out of large highly populated cities and relocate into smaller towns, communicates and villages. Eat healthy foods, breath fresh air, exercise and strengthen your immune system. Above all educate yourself in all areas that interest you… like vaccinations. At the same time don’t become a hermit or seclusionist. Partake in your community, politics and business. Advocate for reason, transparency and openness.

Hey if that five hour debate convinces me that having 300 vaccines and chemicals is good for me I will be the 1st person in line to get them…. but lets have that debate… lets get all the facts in the open.

Here is a good place to start your research….


via Veteransnewsnow