Search Blog Posts

Saturday, September 15, 2012

BREAKING NEWS (Again!) DEC. 1981 - 'GOLD MISSING FROM FORT KNOX,' PLUS UPDATE


This post from the source link below from RMN has NEVER been investigated by a Republican congress, or any other. That the missing gold should be a Constitutional violation has never been a concern of the Supreme Court.  Never a thorough PHYSICAL audit by independent auditors. As you'll readily realize the Gold Commission was a sham. We believe it was CFR Insider Lew Lehrman's task to derail and deflect any meaningful evidence revealed by a physical audit.


Such evidence would, of course, mean criminal indictments one being for high treachery for those current or living politicians and been the final nail in the coffin for the Fed. Hence, the physical of audit of Fort Knox (and NY Fed) was 'kicked down the road' for another time. That Time is now.

The RMN has many other related posts on this issue, be sure to follow the threads to be fully informed. And by all means save the vital images!

Finally, could this recently 'discovered', but unexplained gold hoard in London actually be the US people's Treasury gold : Stash of £156BILLION in gold bars"Found" Stored Underground in London Still Not Explained

Conspiracy fantasy you say? Show us your hard evidence & prove otherwise to us and a bankrupted America.


More recently, Raye has mentioned that the gold has been returned to Fort Knox, under better protection than previously. Below is one of the few articles (from 'The Globe' tabloid out of Canada, 12-15-81) which I have been able to find about Fort Knox during the time that the gold was reportedly missing. Another major media article about Ft. Knox has already appeared in the Reading Room, from The Los Angeles Times of July 1974.
www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/109743

Plus Raye's update on Ft. Knox, which reportedly now has gold:
www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=109744



Source>>  DEC. 1981 - 'GOLD MISSING FROM FORT KNOX,' PLUS UPDATE

Two more of many: