Search Blog Posts

Thursday, February 21, 2013

The U.S. Constitution's Twenty-Seventh Amendment: Limiting Congressional Pay Raises - But WAIT, there's a Catch

While Michael Arnheim  lauds over the 27th Amendment limiting congressional pay, President Obama again flexed his Executive Order muscle and gave congress a raise with more of your money anyway! I mean let's get real, who can even get by when the real inflation rate is closer to 10% than the miserly 1.7% as the fabricated number we're given by government!

Arnheim continues, a fun amendment at last! The Twenty-Seventh Amendment is of interest less for what it says than for the way it was ratified. It was proposed by Congress in 1789 but was ratified only in 1992, more than 200 years later. The Twenty-Seventh Amendment reads as follows:

No law varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.
This seems to be saying that if members of Congress vote themselves a pay raise, the new salaries can’t come into effect until after a congressional election. This looks good because voters would be unimpressed by senators and representatives who’d voted themselves more money — so members of Congress would be less likely to do so, in case the voters turned them out in the intervening election.

However, Congress has gotten around this sensible provision by voting themselves annual cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in 2001 that COLAs are not repugnant to the Twenty-Seventh Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to pronounce on this question. Watch this space.

The U.S. Constitution's Twenty-Seventh Amendment: Limiting Congressional Pay Raises - For Dummies